Isn't It a Bit Weird That So Many People Reject the Big Bang, Without Having an Alternate Scientific Theory?

that explains the observed facts?

What do you think motivates people to reject an established scientific theory that hasn't been challenged by actual scientists in decades?

Suggestion:

Probably the word "theory", no?
Not all religious people reject it; nor are all people who do, religious.
But please, explain per your question who it is that "observed" these "facts" within this "theory"?
Isn't it a fact that what is actually being observed is effects and there exists no one who observed the event? Therefore, there's as much credibility to it as any of man's theories.

Personally, I believe God speaking light on day one, at the speed of light, probably created one hellofa big bang. And a second one again on day four when He again spoke out, at the speed of light, billions and gazillions of stars and galaxies within the universe…some kind of explosion, for sure!

Previous post:

Next post: